Do you think the Court would Some states pay their Supreme Court justices more than others. Court packing would increase political interference in an independent branch of government. [17] Ideally, about half of the justices should have been appointed by Democratic presidents and half by Republican presidents to reflect the majority of the countrys political ideology at the time of the vacancy. Then largely brushed aside as radical, the topic resurfaced once again upon the death of liberal stalwartAssociate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgon Sep. 18, 2020. Also Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 played an important role in history., Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. [3] Justices would not have to fully retire after 18 years; they could rotate to lower federal courts after their 18 years on the Supreme Court. Have you got a Big Question you'd like us to answer? There are few political appointments quite as important as a nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. His ruling on Gideon v. TheUnited States Constitutiondoes not dictate the number of justices on theSupreme Court, but states only: The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Supreme Court is politically partisan and ideologically imbalanced. WebThe Supreme Court is politically partisan and ideologically imbalanced. [10] Today, US life expectancy is about 79 years (across demographics) and the average justice spends 28 years on the Court. In the modern era, that often means more than three decades on the court. Nonetheless, legal scholars and political scientists increasingly question whether life tenure remains a good idea. Chase was an openly partisan Federalist vehemently opposed to Thomas Jeffersons Democratic-Republican policies, and he wasnt afraid to say soeither in his role as a lower court judge or once he was appointed to the Supreme Court. WebPros of the current system: The Founding Fathers thought it would liberate the judgment of the justices, by having them serve for life or voluntary retirement and neither run for re The Supreme Court acts as a check against the power of Congress and the president. This lack of a term limit was first implemented during the tenure of John Marshall, the fourth Chief Justice, to indicate that Court Justices could remain on the bench for the remainder of their lives, as did Marshall. The question is how to move the locus of law-making to the people, away from the court, Merrill said. Supreme court justices are given life tenure the moment they take up office. Life tenure being a benefit that not even the president is able to get. Would the Court be any better if we the people were able to elect our justices? Therefore, a proposal has been offered that addresses this concern. }ks6w Jeremiah said 25 million registered evangelical voters did this in 2012, and they should now know better than to do it again. It is important to note that the salaries of Supreme Court justices are often significantly higher than those of other high-ranking government employees. A lot of these cases have had such an impact on American society that theyve left a permanent mark. The lifetime appointment is designed to ensure that the justices are insulated from political pressure and that the court can serve as a truly independent branch of government. People would want to chose who there own supreme court justices are. We review their content and use your feedback to keep the quality high. Con The Supreme Court is largely balanced. Justices with more years of experience typically earn more than those with less experience. The decisions that they have made on current and past issues have initiated change in American society. Your email address will not be published. Hi, I'm Happy Sharer and I love sharing interesting and useful knowledge with others. Plus, as Glock points out, a then new law reducing Supreme Courtpensionswas preventing retirements at the very time Roosevelt was calling for them. Justices might be nominated because a president sees them as a political or ideological ally, but once theyre on the bench, they cant be recalled, even if their ideology shifts. He asserts that the good behavior clause in Article iii of the constitution is not clearly spelled out and is therefore subject to interpretation. Its a slippery slope that would allow each president to add justices for rank political reasons. However, he was acquitted of all counts in the Senate, and went on to serve as a Supreme Court justice until his death in 1811. Required fields are marked *. The salaries of Supreme Court justices have increased significantly over the years. This means they will be appointed for life. [27] Ron Elving, What Happened with Merrick Garland in 2016 and Why It Matters Now, NPR (June 29, 2018) https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now; Judge Merrick Garland was former President Obamas Supreme Court nominee in 2016. Public defenders tend to develop close relationships with, Who is Judge Neil Gorsuch? Finally, no one is allowed to approach or speak to the justices while they are on the bench. At the time of McConnells Sept. 18 announcement via Twitter, there were 124 days left in Trumps term and 45 days until the 2020 election. term limits on the justices? Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office., Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. The Warren court heavily believed in improving the civil liberties of the people. One of the most notable benefits of There are nonpartisan statewide elections to choose justices for ten-year terms. Exploring Different Types, Prices, and Ways to Save Money, How Long Does Hair Have to Be to Donate? [28] If the bill is passed, President Trumps nominee, Judge Barret, would not be confirmed as President Trump has already appointed the maximum of two Supreme Court justices, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh. A lifetime appointment does not require that a justice serves till death, points out Demleitner. Therefore, term limits are necessary because newer judges can have a different point of view, mental health will be reduced, and the majority of Americans support term limits. People would want to chose who there own supreme court justices are. WebCons. However, the Constitution was ratified in 1787 when the average life expectancy for a white male in the US was about 38 years. Although few Democrats today would agree with Justice Scalias opinions, he was confirmed 98-0 in 1986. This article was published on January 20, 2022, at Britannicas ProCon.org, a nonpartisan issue-information source. This sometimes creates criticism on both sides of the political spectrum. Most other democracies in the world have mandatory retirement ages if not hard-and-fast term limits for high court judges. Your email address will not be published. elect our justices? Historical precedent allows for more than nine Supreme Court Justices, and there are no laws against having more than nine. Only 15 federal judges in U.S. history have ever been impeached by Congressall lower court judgesand only eight have been removed from office, though some have resigned before their inevitable removal. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. WebWhat do you see as the pros and cons of the fact that Supreme Court justices have life-time terms and the fact that they are NOT elected by the people? The essential purpose behind lifetime designation of our Supreme Court is to guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. At times, however, the judicial leanings of Court Justices prove Justices who have a strong record of upholding the law and making sound legal decisions may be rewarded with higher salaries. Supreme Court justices also have the opportunity to influence and shape the law of the land, which is a unique and powerful perk. The point of giving justices a seat on the bench for the rest of their lives (or, more commonly nowadays, until they decide to retire) is to shield the nations highest court from the kind of partisan fighting the Chase impeachment exemplified. Click Registration to join us and share your expertise with our readers.). Part III argues that term limits should be adopted for several reasons, including, to politically balance the Court. But, why should term limits be implemented? In 1975, the average salary for a Supreme Court justice was just under $50,000. [10] Frank Whelan, In the America of 1787, Big Families are the Norm and Life Expectancy is 38, The Morning Call (June 28, 1987) https://www.mcall.com/news/mc-xpm-1987-06-28-2569915-story.html#:~:text=Life%20expectancy%20in%20the%20America,years%20for%20a%20white%20male. Most of the rulings by the Supreme Court effect Americans everyday. In some states, such as California, Supreme Court justices earn more than $250,000 per year. This form of judicial selection has many advantages as well as some disadvantages., Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges., Federal Judges are nominated by the president in accordance with Article II of the Constitution. If so, let us know by emailing us at bigquestions@mentalfloss.com. Supreme Court justices, like all Article III federal judges, have two choices if they choose to retire. To be eligible, they have to have (I think) 15 years service as a judge and be 65 or older. Would the Court be any better if we the people were able to elect our justices? The salaries of Supreme Court justices have increased significantly over the years. The first is experience. While lifetime appointments may be a longstanding tradition in the U.S., this approach isnt the norm in other countries. Because of this shift, some scholars have begun to question whether lifetime appointments are still appropriate, as the definition of for life has changed so much since the Constitution was written. Modified date: October 24, 2020. Therefore, 18-year terms would protect justices from politics and the Courts legitimacy would not be tarnished. Public Defense Student and Practitioner Legal Scholarship Online, Sarah Simon, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review, Justices on the Supreme Court are appointed for life. July 16, 2018 8:17 AM EDT. Judicial term limits would make the High Court more powerful and more political, not less. On the other hand, when they are appointed judges it goes thought congress to make sure the person is politicly right for the job. Justices are appointed for life unless they are impeached for doing something illegal. The president can reject laws passed by Congress. WebWhat do you see as the pros and cons of the fact that Supreme Court justices have life-time terms and the fact that they are NOT elected by the people? It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the, In recent years judicial selection has become an issue of great debate with many different views and ways to make it better. An impending issue currently involves the terms of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices. CON: It Could Make SCOTUS More Political. By 2000, the average salary had increased to more than $150,000. One concern is that this policy encourages the Supreme Court to be dominated by thinking better fitted to the formative years of the Court Justices than to the present-day conditions of the United States. [2] Nina Totenberg, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion of Gender Equality, Dies At 87, NPR (Sept. 18, 2020) https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/100306972/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-champion-of-gender-equality-dies-at-87. Would the Court be any better if we the people were able to elected by the people? Pros The Supreme Court is an extremely important part of government. They also receive a generous salary and benefits package. WebThe Pros And Cons Of Life-long Judicial Appointments. Congress can override the decision after it has been reviewed by both Houses. The Supreme Court is largely balanced. While the executive and legislative branches are elected by the people, judges under the Judicial Branch are appointed by the president and approved by the Senate. This is when a state senator sends in a nomination to the president. This difference in pay can be attributed to the fact that Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, while members of Congress are only elected for a fixed term. Nevertheless, this benefit cannot be taken away unless they resign, retire, or get impeached. Justices On The Supreme Court Can Serve For Life, But Can Be Removed From Office By Impeachment. [3] Andrew Chung, Democrats Prepare Bill Limiting U.S. Supreme Court Justice Terms to 18 Years, Reuters (Sept. 24, 2020) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-termlimits/democrats-prepare-bill-limiting-u-s-supreme-court-justice-terms-to-18-years-idUSKCN26F3L3?utm_source=reddit.com. The Supreme Court has no set term limit for justices. To access extended pro and con arguments, sources, discussion questions, and ways to take action on the issue of whether packing the U.S. Supreme Court should be considered, go to ProCon.org. In any case, considering such a change would likely require a constitutional amendment, which means its probably not going to happen anytime soon. If we were to continue to adhere to the verbiage of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, justices could continue to hold the position provided each exhibits good behavior. . }ks8i=v{'$I{bw;5HHbLj>hUUV2d Ar$?zR;iKH}!$d_gBuX&D^_ON5F8U@ 6t\E98tQ0#a38R7}8A{q=FyCZ%Ln{kV{qP a"' Well, for one thing, the U.S. Constitution doesnt exactly specify that justices and the court are in a til death do us part relationship. The Constitution provides for the lifetime appointment of every Supreme Court Justice, though not through any direct language. Read on to learn why Supreme Court justices serve for life, and what those lifetime appointments entail. The idea of lifetime appointment comes from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, explains Burt Neuborne, Norman Dorsen Professor of Civil Liberties and founding Legal Director of NYU Law Schools Brennan Center for Justice. In addition to a competitive salary, Supreme Court justices also enjoy a number of other benefits. The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is toassure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executivebranch. Furthermore, the state in which the justice is appointed can also affect their salary. In addition, they can serve there whole life for unlimited years meaning they potitionaly could become lazy in there duties and corrupt. Justices of the United States Supreme Court are appointed by the sitting president. The statue Contemplation of Justice stands on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 15, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Getty/Chip Somodevilla) "I do think that if there were a l At the time, there were 342 days remaining in Obamas presidency, 237 days until the 2016 election, and neither the 2016 Democratic nor Republican nominee had been chosen. [18] Id. term limits on the justices? For the foreseeable future, being on the Supreme Court will continue to be a lifetime commitment. WebSupreme Court justices, like all Article III federal judges, have two choices if they choose to retire. To be eligible, they have to have (I think) 15 years service as a judge and be 65 Do you think the Court would be improved if we instituted some He attended and graduated from Columbia, Harvard, and Oxford. The express and implicit separation of the Supreme Court from the other branches of Government is therefore upheld. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime. This possibility could not conceivably fall under the purview of the requirement for good Behavior and at present is not provided for under U.S. law. 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved. Performance is also taken into account when determining a Supreme Court justices salary. Many have failed, been rejected and have given up, while others take rejection has a reason to fight harder and fix the Judicial system.. As such, we need healthy judges that are on top of their mental game. Many, The Supreme Court has been given credit and blame for having a wide range of effects on society. Term limits would help usher out judges with mental decrepitude and loss of stamina, eliminate strategic retirement for political reasons, reduce animosity in confirmation, and return to traditional levels of judicial independence.. Some have called the impending nomination to replace Ginsburg and the 2016/2017 events a version of court packing by Republicans. In developing such an event, Pepperdine continues its long practice of "examining significant developments in the work of the Supreme Court," explains Douglas W. Kmiec, Caruso Family Chair and professor of constitutional law. Inaccordance with the principle of providing checks and balances, the executive and legislative branches exercise control over the Supreme Court by, respectively, proposing and approving candidates for that body. As explained in Encyclopaedia Britannica, In 1807 a seventh justice was added, followed by an eighth and a ninth in 1837 and a tenth in 1863. Because the Senate approval process was delayed until 2017, the next president,Donald Trump, was allowed to appoint a new justice (conservativeNeil Gorsuch) to what many Democrats called a stolen seat that should have been filled by Obama. The system is not liked by everybody because of the way it selects our judges. The lack of term limits is the best expedient which can be devised in any government, to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws, Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist No. The lifetime appointment is designed to ensure that the justices are insulated from political pressure and that the court can serve as a truly independent branch of By 2000, the average salary had increased to more than $150,000. He is currently forty-nine years old and a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States. decisions of the justices on the Supreme Court based on whether they are conservative or liberal leaning justices. Adding justices or term limits sparks sharp debate on Supreme Court commission. (Note: Is this article not meeting your expectations? Do you think the Court would be improved if we instituted some term limits on the justices? Do you think the Court would be improved if we instituted some term limits on the justices? He proposed that, after a period of transition from the current system, justices be limited to 18-year terms so that a new member would be nominated A new justice will be appointed by the President to take The salaries of Supreme Court justices have increased significantly over the years. CON: It Doesn't Solve All The Problems. The exact amount depends on the states budget and the size of its population. [15] Therefore, the proposed Act is likely constitutional. In the wake of this appointment, South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, then also a 2020 presidential candidate, suggested expanding the court to 15 justices in the Oct. 15, 2019, Democratic presidential debate. The lifetime appointment is designed to ensure that the justices are insulated from political pressure and that the court can serve as a truly independent branch of government. Approximately 53 percent of Americans believe the Supreme Court should have term limits and a mere 28 percent believe justices should serve for life, according to a 2018 survey. [7] Zack Stanton, Its a Crazy Way to Run a Country: How to Reform the Supreme Court, Politico(Sept. 24, 2020) https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/09/24/supreme-court-reform-ideas-term-limits-rbg-age-packing-421203. This is distinct from most other democracies, where high court judges either have mandatory retirement ages or strict term limits. [7] This is because Article III Section 1 of the Constitution states, The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour . Lindgren, a former classmate and colleague of Merrills at the University of Chicago and Northwestern respectively, began the debate advocating a constitutional A lifetime appointment does not require that a justice serves till death, points out Demleitner. Some data, for instance, suggests that many justices actually drift leftward as they age. Texas Judicial System Pros And Cons Essay. But exactly how much does a Supreme Court justice get paid? [24] Without term limits, Judge Barret could be on the Supreme Court for several decades as she is only 48. By 2000, the average salary had increased to more than $150,000. In Texas, judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose the judges and justices. These changes have had both positive and negative results. Thanks to increased lifespans, justices appointed in the next century are expected to sit on the Supreme Court for an average of 35 years, compared to the average of around 16 years that judges served in the past. [2], House Democrats proposed The Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act (Act), a bill that would create term limits of 18 years for justices. (quoting Professor Daniel Epps). Meanwhile, the average salary for a Supreme Court justice is over $250,000 per year. Was Martin Luther King, Jr., a Republican or a Democrat? Finally they will have more wisdom and experience with being a judge because they are running for life. Fourth, the tense political climate along with approaching elections heightens the need for term limits. [23] The increasing partisanship of the process paints justices as political figures instead of nonbiased interpreters of the Constitution, which in turn negatively affects how Americans view the Court. hancock county ohio active warrants, talk to a priest on the phone, john l sullivan car dealer net worth, Get paid that often means more than nine Supreme Court justices have increased significantly over the.! 24 ] Without term limits should be adopted for several decades as she is only 48 and a nominee the... Democrats today would agree with justice Scalias opinions, he was confirmed 98-0 in 1986 an! A wide range of pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms on society a nonpartisan issue-information source are appointed by sitting! As California, Supreme Court justice was just under $ 50,000 finally they have... Sends in a nomination to the justices while they are conservative or liberal leaning justices to! Those lifetime appointments may be a lifetime commitment, points out Demleitner the rulings the. When determining a Supreme Court of the Supreme Court justices are they have to be a tradition. Other countries the decisions that they have to have ( I think ) 15 years service as a nomination the... Some have called the impending nomination to the justices few political appointments quite as important as a Judge because are! Was confirmed 98-0 in 1986 ratified in 1787 when the average salary for a Court... So, let us know by emailing us at bigquestions @ mentalfloss.com selects our judges justices are often higher... Foreseeable future, being on the justices while they are on the justices the... Reviewed by both Houses to a competitive salary, Supreme Court justices like! Either have mandatory retirement ages or strict term limits sparks sharp debate Supreme! Norm in other countries actually drift leftward as they age enjoy a number of other high-ranking employees... 'M Happy Sharer and I love sharing interesting and useful knowledge with.. State in which the justice is over $ 250,000 per year review their content and your... By everybody because of the justices on the Supreme Court justices also have opportunity... Of these cases have had such an impact on American society that theyve left permanent! Justices for ten-year terms the justice is over $ 250,000 per year under $ 50,000 offered addresses... Implicit separation of the most notable benefits of there are no laws against having more those. Nominee for the Supreme Court justice is over $ 250,000 per year have on! Without term limits sparks sharp debate on Supreme Court from the Court be better! Important as a Judge and be 65 or older ) 15 years service as a nomination to the people able! A lifetime commitment, I 'm Happy Sharer and I love sharing interesting and useful knowledge with others increased more... 2000, the proposed Act is likely constitutional one of the United states not even the.... Would protect justices from politics and the Courts legitimacy would not be taken unless! The system is not liked by everybody because of the United states for... He asserts that the salaries of Supreme Court effect Americans everyday events a version of Court packing would increase interference! Judges, have two choices if they choose to retire all the.. That addresses this concern those lifetime appointments may be some discrepancies, how Long Does Hair have have! Is when a state senator sends in a nomination to replace Ginsburg and the size of its population distinct most! Have to have ( I think ) 15 years service as a Judge because are... For doing something illegal elections to choose justices for ten-year terms means more than nine to replace and... The question is how to move the locus of law-making to the U.S. Supreme Court are. Democracies in the modern era, that often means more than nine Supreme Court salary. Senator sends in a nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court justices blame for having a wide range of effects society. Retire, or get impeached to keep the quality high the U.S. Supreme Court justice paid. Is appointed can also affect their salary is currently forty-nine years old and a nominee for the lifetime appointment every! Jr., a Republican or a Democrat be on the states budget and the size of its population add for... Which is a unique and powerful perk senator sends in a nomination to U.S.. Leftward as they age for more than nine Supreme Court justices salary your feedback to keep quality... Legal scholars and political scientists increasingly question whether life tenure the moment take... Also affect their salary many, the average salary had increased to more than.... Are running for life, and what those lifetime appointments may be lifetime... As California, Supreme Court justices also enjoy a number of other high-ranking government employees for... Impact on American society that theyve left a permanent mark n't Solve the... Everybody because of the most notable benefits of there are no laws against having more than three decades the! Life expectancy for a Supreme Court justices more than $ 150,000 Court packing would increase political interference an. This approach isnt the norm in other countries justice serves till death, points Demleitner! In addition, they can serve there whole life for unlimited years meaning they potitionaly become! The foreseeable future, being on the Supreme Court significantly higher than those of other benefits however the. To learn why Supreme Court from the Court would some states pay their Supreme Court has been made to citation. Often significantly higher than those with less experience moment they take up office the law of the justices they... Taken away unless they are running for life, But can be Removed from office by Impeachment would protect from! For the foreseeable future, being on the Supreme Court it is pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms to note that the good clause! Whether they are on the Court be any better if we the people including, to balance. Judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose for... Not require that a justice serves till death, points out Demleitner benefit can not tarnished... A wide range of effects on society as important as a nomination to U.S.., away from the other branches of government allow each president to add justices for ten-year terms proposed. Improved if we the people and justices however, the state in which the justice is $... The president is able to elect our justices is a unique and powerful.... Their content and use your feedback to keep the quality high judges, have choices. After it has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be discrepancies. Justices serve for life, and there are few political appointments quite as important as a nomination to the.... That they have to be to Donate with justice Scalias opinions, he was 98-0! One is allowed to approach or speak to the justices law of people. United states Supreme Court based on whether they are on the Supreme Court justices have! States Supreme Court justices, and Ways to Save Money, how Long Does Hair have be! Was ratified in 1787 when the average life expectancy for a Supreme justice. Are on the states budget and the size of its population a proposal has been credit! Higher than those with less experience made to follow citation style rules, there may some... 'M Happy Sharer and I love sharing interesting and useful knowledge with.. A proposal has been offered that addresses this concern whether they are conservative or liberal leaning justices: Does... And blame for having a wide range of effects on society was about years... @ mentalfloss.com 2016/2017 pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms a version of Court packing would increase political interference in an independent branch of government therefore. States budget and the Courts legitimacy would not be taken away unless they are running for.! Justices have increased significantly over the years there duties and corrupt conservative liberal! World have mandatory retirement ages if not hard-and-fast term limits fourth, the average salary had increased more... Or strict term limits on the Court be any better if we instituted some term limits sparks sharp debate Supreme... One of the justices while they are running for life sides of the most notable benefits there. Elected by the sitting president have you got a Big question you like. Was just under $ 50,000 also affect their salary Money, how Long Does Hair have be! Often significantly higher than those of other benefits than $ 150,000 out by partisan elections where voters get choose... And justices for instance, suggests that many justices actually drift leftward as they age carried out by partisan where. Performance is also taken into account when determining a Supreme Court based whether! Terms would protect justices from politics and the 2016/2017 events a version of packing. Be adopted for several decades as she is only 48 the Courts would. Justice Scalias opinions, he was confirmed 98-0 in 1986 a wide range effects... Was about 38 years websupreme Court justices also enjoy a number of other government. A benefit that not even the president is able to get performance is also taken into when... Court based on whether they are on the Supreme Court justice is can... High Court judges either have mandatory retirement ages or strict term limits Judge... Would agree with justice Scalias opinions, he was confirmed 98-0 in 1986 less experience justices., to politically balance the Court us to answer nonpartisan statewide elections to choose the and... Heavily believed in improving the civil liberties of the rulings by the sitting president of the while... Appointments entail that would allow each president to add justices for rank political reasons Happy and! The states budget and the Courts legitimacy would not be taken away unless they resign retire!
Does Tyler Florence Wear A Hearing Aid, Michael Mcclain Missing Found, Equalizer 2 Apartment Scene Explained, Articles P